Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerI believe that the standard background check should include not only criminal convictions but stays in mental health facilities. I also think (and i don't know how it would work) that it should also include information held by law enforcement agencies, like the FBIs no fly list. |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerNo, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerYes, their services reach far beyond abortions and can save many lives through cancer screening, prenatal services, and adoption referrals |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerNo, tax carbon emissions instead |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerNo, and transition all current government student loans into privately managed accounts |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerAs it stands now, iwth more than a decade between sentencing and execution, NO I do not support it. In cases with no doubt, if the sentence is death do it asap. Any case with doubt, no and after ten years, you are no longer executing the same person. It just becomes murder after a while. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerNo, it should be covered like any other prescription |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerNo, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only increase for the elderly, disabled and CHILDR EN. Everyone always forgets the children |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answerYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerWe should give equal support to Israel and Palestine. |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerHaving lost a loved one to suicide I say no, it is never the answer. However, were I dying a slow and terrible death? I would end it. But I couldn't do that to my kids, so I wouldn't. But, maybe I would. Too big an issue, too emotionally charged for a survey |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerNo, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for public projects and never for private projects |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only as a coordinated effort by the United Nations |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should let China address this issue |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerDecrease |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should not legitimize ISIS as a sovereign entity |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerNo. I live in a state with a well managed plan. Might be different if I lived elsewhere |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.