Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerAs long as obama has our borders wide open, invalid vetting of refugee's coming into America, and the on going terrorist activities going on all over the World, yes,a watchful eye need's to be in place. We are at war with terrorist, like it or not. |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerNo, and transition all current government student loans into privately managed accounts |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerYes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerNo, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answerNo, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerMost people have some sort of ID, if they didnt they couldnt drive, buy beer and wine, rent or buy a home, buy a car, get welfare, food stamps, and all the other free stuff out there that Working Tax payers, pay for them to have stuff "FREE" Many Photo ID's dont prove a thing. There should be a National Government ID card issued to every person, the day they are born, with a social security number on it and a thumb print,and thats your's for life, just keep up dating as you grow. If we need a passport, we get one, and they check us out. If you want to vote, Be American, and Have legal Valid Photo ID. |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerI support the Act, but as we all can see, all it takes is one person, in this case obama. Open the borders, dont stop or detain, dont deport, so why have a law or Act, that one person can over step and do what he or she want's. Then top it off with a congress,senate,supreme court,and 5 branches of the Armed Forces, that all do nothing but let obama break the law! Why have the act at all, we have illegal's and terrorist all over the United States, and obama supports that ! |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerYes, but respect Israel’s sovereignty and do not dictate how it should interact with its neighbors |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerNo, it is necessary for violent criminals who are a danger to themselves and other inmates |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerDecrease |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerNo, and minority groups should not receive any favorable treatment |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerNo, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerNo, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answerNo mass troop movement into Syria. Only the special forces that need to be on the ground to conduct business for air strikes and special operations. Drone's called in to hit targets, and Air Force Raining bomb's. No more American Blood. The refugees run, and Americans go in. Whats wrong here ?? |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should let China address this issue |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerYes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerNo, and stop spending current funds on other programs |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerThey need to be taken to GITMO, they are not American, so they dont enjoy the rights we do. No trials on U.S. soil. Only takes one judge to feel kind hearted and say, oh poor guy, I will release you to the streets of America, and I know you will appear for your hearing! Oh and then they want asylum, because they are on American soil. GITMO only, and they will keep a light on in the window for you! |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should not legitimize ISIS as a sovereign entity |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerI have no faith in the government to conduct a honest audit. It does need to be done with accountants from WE THE PEOPLE over seeing the audit. I would like to know, is there GOLD in Fort Knox or has that been given away ? |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, surveillance of all foreign countries is essential to tracking potential terrorist threats |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerTry it and see how it works out, can always go back and re-think it. But no American TAX dollars to Cuba. |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerNo reason why farmers can not grow food all year long. There's people all over the world in need of food. The children can not eat money, but they can eat fresh produce, and their Country pay's Our Farmers to grow it! |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should let the Russians take out ISIS |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerMost government systems need to be fixed. Some agencies allow a person to work unlimited over time the last year working, and that is how they base the retirement, ( Thats Wrong ) and the American Tax payers pick up the tab. All Governments need to reduce spending, and work with in a budget. |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerYes, but it should not replace our national treasury-backed currency |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.