More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Other) voters
Last answered 58 seconds ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Other) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by news.com.au
5 years ago by allout.org
5 years ago by twentytwowords.com
5 years ago by bbc.co.uk
5 years ago by upworthy.com
5 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Gay Marriage
On June 26, 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the denial of marriage licenses violated the Due Process and the Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The ruling made same sex marriage legal in all 50 U.S. States. See recent gay marriage news
More stances on this issue
I think the states should decide, but the definition of marriage should not be changed. 5 years ago from a Republican in Ceres, CA
Yes, but not allowed to adopt. Children need a mother and a father. Look at the prison's and you'll see 90% of them were raised by single parents.... usually the mothers. 5 years ago from a Republican in Marietta, GA
Take government out of marriage and instead make it a personal but not necessarily religious contract. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Farmingdale, NY
Marriage is a religious term, so all licensing done by the states are to be legal unions with no prejudice on sexuality or quantity. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Maricopa, AZ
Government should not have authority to license marriage between anybody. Private sector individuals should decide what to do, and what to call it. Marriage is a religious act and should not be permitted by the state to a private sector entity. 5 years ago from a Republican in South Bend, IN
The federal government has NO business in this theater of operations, other than ensuring the federal government does not withhold federal benefits or privileges from same-sex couples in a state sanctioned union. 5 years ago from a Republican in Marlborough, MA