Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
75% Yes |
25% No |
75% Yes |
25% No |
See how support for each position on “Foreign Real Estate Investment” has changed over time for 235 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Foreign Real Estate Investment” has changed over time for 235 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MV968B1wk1W
No, so long as they are using the property for residential purposes.
@RobinHoude 6 days6D
Yes, and take measures to discourage the use of housing as an investment in general
@nathanrose16 days6D
Yes, but only for land need military bases and government buildings
@9MXZ4576 days6D
I think healthy restrictions on non-citizens would be good, but where it doesn't impact the local housing market, making housing harder for citizens to get
@9MWCRCH1wk1W
Yes, and tax land bought by foreigners unless it's for buisness
@9MW35WN1wk1W
Yes, but only for Chinese, Russian, Iranian and investors from hostile countries.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
