Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
78% Yes |
22% No |
78% Yes |
22% No |
See how support for each position on “Affordable Housing” has changed over time for 1.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Affordable Housing” has changed over time for 1.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9L4Z23B 1wk1W
No, local governments and zoning boards should reform zoning laws to allow higher density building and to help construct more housing than there is demand
@9N2NDHJ5 days5D
Again depends. Where is the subsidy coming from? People are already taxed to death. We need to promote responsibility.
@9MZC7785 days5D
No, but repeal any laws, zoning, etc. that prevent it.
@9MYMGYN6 days6D
Yes, and the definition of affordable needs to be based on no more than 1/3 of income.
@9MXZ4576 days6D
I think some housing should be made for very low-income individuals and families. However, consistent and good outreach homeless assistance and an affordable housing overall would be best
@9MX26BJ1wk1W
No, repeal NIMBY zoning laws that restrict the building of affordable housing instead
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Affordable Housing” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.