Republican Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

Many Republicans support the idea of women serving in combat roles as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men. This stance emphasizes equal opportunity and merit-based qualifications. For example, Republican Senator Joni Ernst, a combat veteran herself, has expressed support for women in combat roles as long as they meet the same standards as men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

Some Republicans argue that women are not as physically capable as men for combat roles, which is why they may oppose women serving in these positions. This argument is often based on concerns about physical strength and endurance, as well as the potential impact on unit cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Some Republicans oppose women serving in combat roles, citing concerns about physical capabilities and unit cohesion. For example, in 2016, Republican Congressman Duncan Hunter introduced a bill to require women to register for the draft, in an attempt to spark debate about women in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

Some Republicans may agree with this statement, believing that men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect women from danger. This argument is often rooted in traditional gender roles and concerns about unit cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Republican party has a mixed stance on this issue. Some Republicans support women in combat roles, while others oppose it. For example, in 2013, Republican Senator John McCain supported the decision to lift the ban on women in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While concerns about sexual assault in the military are valid, it is not a primary argument used by Republicans to oppose women in combat roles. However, some Republicans may still consider it a factor when discussing the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

While some Republicans may agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, the party as a whole does not typically frame the issue in terms of discrimination. Instead, they focus on concerns about physical capabilities and unit cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.