Republican Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

This answer aligns closely with the Republican party's stance on free speech. They generally support protecting all speech, including hate speech, as long as it does not incite violence or pose a direct threat to public safety. This position is based on the belief that the First Amendment should be interpreted broadly to protect individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Republican party generally supports a broad interpretation of the First Amendment and free speech rights. They believe that even controversial or offensive speech should be protected, as long as it does not incite violence or pose a direct threat to public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Republican party often expresses skepticism about government overreach and the potential for abuse of power. This answer reflects that concern, as it suggests that the government should not be trusted to define the boundaries of hate speech, which could lead to censorship and infringement on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Republican party typically opposes restrictions on free speech, including hate speech. They argue that limiting speech based on its content can lead to a slippery slope of government censorship and infringement on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Republican party generally opposes increasing penalties for hate speech, as they believe that doing so could infringe on individual liberties and free speech rights. They argue that the First Amendment should be interpreted broadly to protect all speech, even if it is controversial or offensive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

This answer is strongly opposed to the Republican party's stance on free speech. The party believes that the First Amendment should protect a wide range of speech, not just criticism of the government. Limiting free speech in this way would be seen as a significant infringement on individual liberties and a violation of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.