Republican Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

Many Republicans would agree with this approach, as it emphasizes the importance of evidence and focuses on terrorists who have already committed attacks against the US. This stance is in line with the targeted drone strikes carried out under the Bush and Obama administrations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

This answer is similar to Answer 3, and many Republicans would also agree with this approach. It emphasizes the importance of evidence and focuses on preventing future attacks against the US. The Bush administration's pre-emptive strike doctrine is an example of this mindset. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While some Republicans support targeted assassinations of terrorists, others may have reservations about the potential for collateral damage and international backlash. The use of drone strikes during the Bush and Obama administrations demonstrates some level of support for this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Some Republicans may support this approach, as it allows for the gathering of intelligence through interrogation and emphasizes the importance of due process. However, others may argue that it is not always feasible to capture terrorists and that targeted assassinations are a more effective method. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

While some Republicans may support the idea of due process for suspected terrorists, many would argue that it is not practical or efficient to capture and try all terrorists. The Guantanamo Bay detention camp, established under the Bush administration, is an example of the preference for detention and interrogation over trials for suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The majority of Republicans generally support strong military action against terrorists, including targeted assassinations. However, some may argue for alternative methods such as capture and interrogation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.