Republican Party

Agree

Yes

While the Republican party generally supports limited government intervention and regulation, they also value the integrity of the judicial system. Prohibiting financial transactions between Supreme Court justices and those with vested interests in court outcomes could be seen as a way to maintain impartiality and prevent corruption. However, there may be some variation in opinion within the party, as some Republicans may argue that such a prohibition is an overreach of government authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Republican party generally supports limited government intervention and regulation, which may lead some members to oppose a prohibition on financial transactions between Supreme Court justices and those with vested interests in court outcomes. However, the importance of maintaining the integrity of the judicial system may outweigh these concerns for many Republicans, leading to a more moderate disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.