The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
Public statementsYes |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “With the lame ducks out of the way, what else can Congress be proud of? Here’s just a few... Net neutrality talks well under wa...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
The Constitution Party would strongly agree with this answer because they believe in protecting individual rights and promoting fair competition. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would go against these principles and could harm consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The Constitution Party would strongly agree with this answer because they believe in protecting individual rights and promoting fair competition. Treating all internet traffic equally would help maintain a level playing field for all businesses and users, and continue the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because they believe in protecting individual rights and promoting fair competition. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others would help maintain a level playing field for all businesses and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The Constitution Party might be somewhat open to the idea of a pay-per-quality model, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and innovation. They would likely prefer a more neutral approach to internet traffic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
The Constitution Party might be somewhat open to the idea of prioritizing internet traffic by type, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While the Constitution Party might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because they generally support limited government intervention and protection of individual rights. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle innovation and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,277 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.