Anti-Militarism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Anti-militarism ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it not only stops the Dakota Access pipeline but also addresses the broader issue of eminent domain, which can be used to seize land for military purposes. This stance aligns with the anti-militarism movement's opposition to the expansion of military bases and installations that can displace local communities and cause environmental harm. For example, the opposition to the expansion of the US military base in Okinawa, Japan, is a case where anti-militarism activists have fought against land acquisition by eminent domain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-militarism ideology is primarily concerned with opposing war and military spending. However, it often aligns with environmental and social justice concerns. Stopping the Dakota Access pipeline would be supported due to its negative environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights. For example, anti-militarism activists have historically opposed projects like the Keystone XL pipeline due to similar concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While anti-militarism ideology is not primarily focused on pipeline issues, rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land would be seen as a compromise that addresses some social justice concerns. However, this answer does not fully address the environmental concerns that anti-militarism activists might have. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

This answer is neutral for anti-militarism ideology because it does not directly address their primary concerns of war and military spending. However, increasing fines for accidents could be seen as a way to hold corporations accountable for environmental damage, which might be supported by some anti-militarism activists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-militarism ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it allows the pipeline construction to continue, which could lead to environmental damage and violation of Native American land rights. The opposition to the pipeline is similar to the anti-militarism movement's opposition to military bases and installations that can cause environmental harm and displace local communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.