Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NDDCWV from Illinois answered…7mins7m

It depends. If the money is used for the elderly or physically disabled then I agree with this. However, I work in Behav…

 @9NDB2PZ from Virginia answered…1hr1H

Yes, people should work to get benefits, but give them healthcare while they are searching for jobs.

 @9L4Z23B from Pennsylvania answered…2hrs2H

No, as long as individuals have paid premiums for at least 3 months or the pre-existing condition is considered to be li…

 @9L4Z23B from Pennsylvania answered…2hrs2H

More, allow TRICARE to negotiate premiums and out of pocket costs with private doctors and private insurance

 @9ND8RVV from New York answered…2hrs2H

Yes. Requiring companies to cover people with higher likelihood of requiring high-cost services means the insurance comp…

 @9ND4NTQ from California answered…4hrs4H

I support this ONLY for the working poor, not for unemployed. I support this for those who are low income elderly or dis…

 @9ND48XJ from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

No, a vaccination should never be required as this is a direct infringement on personal and civil liberty.

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but focus on qualities of care outside of drugs and increase natural coping/solutions for anxiety and depression. P…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

No, it is a constitutional right to allow companies to promote their product. Instead, create counter influence campaign…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but increase penalties for people using machinery under influence such as cars. Hold people accountable if an injur…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

No, due to people receiving Medicaid being disabled, but they should require able bodied and mentally capable individual…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

No, if vaccination of even deadlier diseases can be prevented due to “religious reasons” on innocent children, the requi…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

No, each state should decide this issue. Also, increasing vetting so Medicaid goes to people who genuinely need it and n…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…6hrs6H

No, but more action should be taking towards companies extorting people from life-saving drugs like insuline.

 @9NCWSJ4 from New York answered…6hrs6H

No, Coronavirus is not considered a pandemic anymore, and people should have the option to choose on getting a vaccine f…

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…7hrs7H

Yes, and we need to institute more in-house treatment for drug rehab and mental health problems. Sending people home, ba…

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…7hrs7H

How about labels and instagram/TicTok videos explaining the risks. Banning makes it more desirable for many young people…

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…7hrs7H

It's going to happen. However, I believe that public use needs to have heavier penalities for alchol, marijuana, and oth…

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…7hrs7H

Usually, the hospitals and pharmacies help 'regulate' the prices, but we need a law or parameters for when companies are…

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…7hrs7H

The vaccine has proven to have too many serious side effects and also not prevent the spread of COVID. Covid has been sh…

 @9NCR9K3from Guam  answered…9hrs9H

Yes, with the exception for religious employees. Who cannot or are forbidden because of their religion.

 @9NC9XR7 from Oregon answered…17hrs17H

This should be up to the businesses, not the government. For this reason, jobs within the government are more than welco…

 @9NC6SY5 from New Jersey answered…20hrs20H

Yes, but provide support towards getting people out of addiction as well, legalize drugs to provide further regulation o…

 @9NC22VJ from Illinois answered…24hrs24H

Yes, but it should come with limitations. They should not require people who at high risk to be vaccinated such the disa…