Alright, "Fart_Smeller68" – let's logically examine your arguments, and discuss some highly disturbing moral implications it brings about. Number 1:
How is it separate if it still lives in and feeds off the birthing person?
First off, I'd like to share something exciting about the English language with you – the great ancient word "mother." It's actually been used for (get this!) thousands of years to describe women, who give birth to babies, because women are the only people who give birth to babies. It's your lucky day – instead of humiliating yourself, looking like a moronic halfwit indoctrinated with Marxist BS, you can actually talk like a human being just by submitting the word mother for the dystopian term "birthing person". A quick fix like that will significantly increase your credibility, and, most excitingly of all, give to others the impression, which everyone should want to give, that you have an IQ reading. Just by following this bit of friendly advice, you'll instantly look ten thousand times less stupid! Hope this information helps you in life :)
Now that we've got the pleasantries aside, let's dissect your actual argument, which is essentially that the human being in question is not a human being if it cannot survive without his/her mother. (I know, I know, you said "birthing person" but I'm in a generous mood, and for the sake of argument, I'll gladly overlook that term and try to forget you ever said it.) That may not be what you explicitly stated, but that is a necessary assumption to make your argument remotely logical (and if it's not remotely logical, well, my work here is done.) But let's look at how absurd that is. If it's alright to slaughter another human being, in cold blood, because he is dependent upon another human being for his existence, that brings up incredibly disturbing moral implications. By the same logic (and any logic you use, you have got to use consistently) people who are in hospital beds, with pacemakers, or life support, or ventilators, or any type of outside interference that is preserving their lives,Read more
@fart_smeller683mos3MO
also, i would like to mention that people with alzheimer's, dementia, and other things you mentioned are definitely not living off of other people. they're being treated by people who choose to help them and are paid to do so, with machines and medicine. someone pregnant, not by their own decision or desire, is forced to grow a fetus off of their own flesh and blood. they are not the same thing, and comparing a fully-grown human to a barely living fetus is idiotic, honestly, more moronic than using the term "birthing person."
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
Apparently you've either never encountered someone with late-stage dementia or, when you did, you were too busy watching TikTok reels to glance for five seconds (or however long it takes your brain to process obvious information, which, having never met you, I can't with any accuracy estimate) at the sorry person before you. People with dementia need to have their diapers changed, their food cooked and presented to them (not to mention a twice-daily refresher on how to use a fork) and their water glass kept full, and they need to be constantly supervised so they don't wander into the streetsRead more
@fart_smeller683mos3MO
you are pretty embarrassing, jesus christ. i never said we don't live off of other people, but living off of other people and a fetus living off a person's body are not the same things. consumerism and birth are not comparable, jeez louise! you're a little coocoo, y'know, patriot? but I still love you, sweetie pie. you'll be mine forever.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Don't worry, feeling embarrassed is totally normal after someone schools you and mops the floor with your argument's bloody carcass. Yes, unborn children living off their mothers and us living off other people are very comparable, and you've provided no evidence they aren't. This entire argument was an emotional unload totally devoid of all logic.
@fart_smeller683mos3MO
yeah i knew birthing person would make you mad lmao you're so chronically on this site it's just sad. you don't understand science and you're embarrassing yourself.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
"You don't understand science and you're embarrassing yourself," says the person failing to acknowledge the most fundamental components of biological reality
@fart_smeller683mos3MO
where have i failed to acknowledge the most fundamental components of biological reality? where?? where??? please, I must know... i hate sounding stupid and unknowledgeable on a discussion website filled with incels worse than reddit!
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Oh, by using the term "birthing person" you implied that people can switch genders ... which is demonstrably false and opposite biological reality. In addition, claiming unborn children are not human is ignoring biological reality as well – it can be proven that they are separate human beings from the point of conception.
@fart_smeller683mos3MO
i nutted thinking about you last night
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
This is the point when it dawned on me that you're not a left-wing bot – someone actually exists in Missouri this stupid