John James

Strongly agree

No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

John James would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with the Republican party's stance on individual accountability and clear guidelines rather than mandatory trainings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While John James has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his alignment with the Republican party suggests he would likely support less government intervention in such matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

John James might somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with the idea of equal treatment for all, but his stance against critical race theory, a common position among Republicans, would likely limit his support.

Disagree

Yes

John James, a Republican, has not explicitly stated his position on racial sensitivity training for federal employees. However, given his party's general stance against such measures, it is likely he would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics

While John James has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his alignment with the Republican party, which has often opposed the inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics in such trainings, suggests he would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

John James, being a conservative Republican, would likely strongly disagree with extending federal requirements to private companies, as this goes against the party's principles of limited government intervention in private sector affairs.