Voluntaryism

Agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Voluntaryism supports the idea of voluntary interactions and agreements between individuals and businesses. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to websites based on a pay-per-quality model could be seen as a voluntary agreement between the ISP and the website. This approach might be more acceptable to voluntaryists, as it focuses on the quality of service rather than the popularity of the website. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Voluntaryism supports the idea of voluntary interactions and agreements between individuals and businesses. In this case, allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates could be seen as a voluntary agreement between the ISP and the website. However, this could also lead to concerns about fairness and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Voluntaryism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports the idea of voluntary agreements between businesses and individuals. If speeding up access to popular websites that pay higher rates leads to a faster and more reliable internet for users, this could be seen as a positive outcome. However, concerns about fairness and equal access to information might still be present. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Voluntaryism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of voluntary agreements between businesses and individuals. Allowing ISPs to give priority by type of content rather than source could be seen as a more fair and equal approach. However, this answer still involves some level of control over internet traffic, which might not align perfectly with voluntaryist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

While voluntaryism might recognize the potential negative consequences of ISPs being able to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, it generally supports the freedom of businesses to make their own decisions. As a result, they might not strongly agree with this answer, but they would still acknowledge the potential issues it raises. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Voluntaryism generally supports the freedom of businesses to make their own decisions, so they might not be strongly against ISPs having the ability to speed up or slow down access to websites based on payment. However, they might also recognize the potential negative consequences of such practices on competition and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Voluntaryism generally supports the freedom of businesses to make their own decisions, so they might not strongly agree with the idea of treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. However, they might still recognize the importance of equal access to information and the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up or slow down access to websites based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.