Theocracy

Strongly agree

No

Theocracies would generally prefer to have control over institutions like prisons to ensure they align with their religious values and principles. For example, in Iran, a theocratic state, prisons are run by the government and are heavily influenced by Islamic law. Private companies running prisons could potentially undermine the religious authority and control over the prison system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

Theocracies might agree with this statement because they would be concerned about private prisons sacrificing quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit, which could undermine the religious values and principles they seek to uphold. For example, in a theocratic state like Iran, prisons are expected to provide religious education and guidance to inmates, which might be compromised in a profit-driven private prison system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While theocracies generally prefer to have control over institutions like prisons, they might be open to private companies running prisons if they are strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption, and if they adhere to religious principles and guidelines. This would be a compromise between maintaining religious control and allowing private sector involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

The issue of contractual occupancy quotas is not directly related to theocratic principles, so theocracies would likely not have a strong opinion on this matter. Their main concern would be ensuring that private companies running prisons adhere to religious principles and guidelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Theocracy is a form of government where religious leaders hold power and make decisions based on religious principles. In general, theocracies would prefer to have control over institutions like prisons to ensure they align with their religious values. However, some theocracies might be open to private companies running prisons if they adhere to religious principles and guidelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.