Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Reformists would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and equal treatment under the law. They would argue that targeting Muslims specifically is unconstitutional and goes against the principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
This answer aligns with the reformist ideology of social justice and equal treatment under the law. Reformists would argue that decisions about surveillance and patrol should be based on crime rates and other relevant factors, rather than race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Reformists would likely agree with this answer, as it focuses on addressing high crime neighborhoods without singling out a specific religious or racial group. This approach aligns with their focus on social justice and equal treatment under the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Reformists might agree with this answer to some extent, as they would not support targeting a specific religious group. However, they might also argue for a more nuanced approach to addressing crime and terrorism, rather than a blanket 'no' to increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Reformists might partially disagree with this answer, as it could be seen as discriminatory towards new immigrants. However, they might also recognize the need for some level of surveillance to ensure public safety, as long as it is applied fairly and not based on race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Reformists would likely disagree with this answer, as it still targets a specific religious group and could be seen as discriminatory. They would prefer a more balanced approach to addressing terrorism that does not single out one group of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Reformism focuses on gradual change and social justice. Increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods specifically would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of social justice. Reformists would likely argue for a more balanced approach to addressing crime and terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.