The United States and coalition forces invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after the September 11 terror attacks. After the attacks, U.S. intelligence officials determined that the Afghani-based militant organization Al-Qaeda was responsible. In 2001 90% of Afghanistan was controlled by the Sunni Islamic military organization The Taliban. After the Taliban refused requests by U.S. President George W. Bush to dismantle Al-Qaeda the U.S. launched military operations known as Operation Enduring Freedom. As of June 27, 2019 2,419 U.S. troops have died in the conflict.
67% Yes |
33% No |
67% Yes |
33% No |
See how support for each position on “Afghanistan” has changed over time for 33.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Afghanistan” has changed over time for 33.1k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8XB8NH52yrs2Y
Yes, however, Biden's botched withdrawal is the best example of how NOT to do it.
@8X95KPY2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should have been done in a better manner that did not result in leaving equipment in the rush to leave
@8QW3YH53yrs3Y
@8FF8RJS4yrs4Y
Yes, but pulling out needs to be done carefully. Civilians should be polled by US forces to assist in the formation of a stable government of their choosing, not the United States installing a leader that the civilians of Afghanistan disprove of.
@8XH56DM2yrs2Y
Yes but it needs an actual plan to get out without hurting allies and people that relied on us during that time
@8XDFFD82yrs2Y
Yes, well we pulled the majority of troops out. But we should have had a better exit strategy.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Afghanistan” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH16hrs16H
In a significant development that has captured international attention, the Pentagon has released findings from a comprehensive review concerning one of the darkest moments in the final days of the U.S. military's presence in Afghanistan. The review meticulously examined the circumstances leading up to the tragic suicide bombing at Kabul's Abbey Gate in August 2021, which resulted in the loss of 13 American troops and scores of Afghan civilians. This incident, occurring during the chaotic evacuation efforts from Afghanistan, has been a subject of intense scrutiny and speculation.Contrary to earlier claims made by some Marines who survived the attack, the review concluded that there was no evidence to support the notion that the bomber was identified or in the sights of Marine snipers before the explosion. This finding disputes the allegations that had suggested a potential missed opportunity to prevent the attack, raising questions about the accuracy of the initial accounts and the challenges faced by troops on the ground.The Pentagon's investigation involved conducting new interviews and re-evaluating available intelligence to address the lingering questions about the bombing. The review aimed to provide clarity and closure to the families of the victims and the public, emphasizing the chaotic and complex nature of the situation that U.S. forces were operating under during the evacuation.This latest review is part of the U.S. military's broader effort to understand the events leading up to its withdrawal from Afghanistan and to assess its actions during the final days of its two-decade-long involvement in the country. The findings highlight the unpredictable and perilous environment that characterized the evacuation efforts, underscoring the challenges faced by service members as they endeavored to secure the airport against threats.The Pentagon's report has not only shed light on the tragic events of that day but also contributed to the ongoing discourse on the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. It serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities and dangers of military operations in conflict zones, and the sacrifices made by those who serve.
@ISIDEWITH1wk1W
What a perfect campaign scandal. Montana Senate candidate Tim Sheehy says in stump speech he was shot in the arm in Afghanistan. Post finds a Ranger report of him admitting he accidentally shot himself in the arm in Glaciar National Park in 2015 and paying a $525 fine over it.Sheehy says the campaign speech version is correct, and he was lying in 2015 about shooting himself to protect his former Afghanistan platoonmates from an investigation.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
Vice President Kamala Harris on Sunday pushed back against Russian President Vladimir Putin’s claim that Ukraine had a hand in a terrorist attack in Moscow that killed at least 133 people.“No,” Harris said, when asked by ABC’s Rachel Scott if the U.S. had any evidence of Ukrainian involvement in the attack on a concert hall in Russia’s capital Friday night. “And first, let me start by saying what has happened is an act of terrorism and the number of people who’ve been killed is obviously a tragedy and we should all send our condolences to those families.”"First, let me start by saying what has happened is an act of terrorism and the number of people who've been killed is obviously a tragedy," said Vice President Kamala Harris. “No, there is no, whatsoever, any evidence and, in fact, what we know to be the case is that ISIS-K is actually, by all accounts, responsible for what happened,” Harris added.Putin suggested Ukrainian forces were involved during a televised address Saturday night. Ukrainian officials have denied any involvement in the massacre, while the Islamic State group’s affiliate in Afghanistan has claimed responsibility for what’s become one of the deadliest attacks on Russian soil in recent years.Schumer urges Congress to 'step up' in supporting Ukraine aid.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH1wk1W
Active 13hrs agoArtificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Lethal autonomous weapons systems use artificial intelligence to identify and kill human targets without human intervention. Russia, the United States and China have…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Active 1 day agoProponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
