Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MJCZTR from Hawaii answered…2hrs2H

yes, but it is still public property so they have to conduct themselves in that way, they can be removed if they are cau…

 @9MJ9YDD from Oregon answered…4hrs4H

for their own safety from the public, and from businesses that would inevitably behave cruely to deter them from camping…

 @9MJ9M5L from Utah answered…5hrs5H

there should be specific places for them to go that aren't necessarily a program or shelter just a protected grassy are…

 @9MJ8Z6G from California answered…5hrs5H

well technically they have no where to be so even if its a crime to sleep or camp on public property it wouldn't matter…

 @9MJ8PMR from Louisiana answered…5hrs5H

I dont think high density would be beneficial those who suffer from houslessness struggle when transitioning back to hom…

 @9MJ7R8G from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but these new buildings should be centered around walkability, public transit, and should be built to be human-scal…

 @9MJ7R8G from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

The minority of homeless people who refuse shelter typically have some bad experience with it. I think it's better to al…

 @9MJ7JMS from Virginia answered…6hrs6H

Yes, high density AFFORDABLE residential buildings which do not cause property taxes to skyrocket and push out long-stan…

 @9MJ75GK from California answered…6hrs6H

if they aren't damaging the property and making a mess then yes, not they are disrupting the area then no

 @9MJ6R9B from Indiana answered…6hrs6H

Assign public hours (i.e. 8:30 AM to 9:30 PM) where they can’t sleep there. Sleeping past it will be met with a reminder…

 @9MJ5LF8 from Illinois answered…7hrs7H

it isnt that they should be allowed to stay there but instead unvilified in order to better help them get on their own f…

 @9MJ5585 from California answered…8hrs8H

Yes, in certain areas as long as they keep it clean and don't do drugs or stab each other. There should be campsites or…

 @9MJ54VF from California answered…8hrs8H

Homeless should be able to sleep someone on public property if they refuse the option to sleep in shelters or housing. L…

 @9MJ544M from Nevada answered…8hrs8H

Depending on the reasoning behind their homelessness and refusal, they should be able to sleep on certain public propert…

 @9MJ4GC2 from Florida answered…8hrs8H

In municipal areas where high housing density is required and in areas that will not suffer environmental degradation on…

 @9MJ46NK from Connecticut answered…8hrs8H

Yes because means more people but no cause it will also make property for everybody more expensive I think.

 @9MJ2NV5 from North Carolina answered…9hrs9H

if they refused to go to available shelter or housing but want to be in a public space then just move them or ask them t…

 @9MJ2GJG from Connecticut answered…9hrs9H

Yes, we should also be concerned with the availability of vacant homes and should be funding their refurbishment. In ter…

 @9MJ25S9 from Colorado answered…9hrs9H

Yes, are we just going to throw them in a river? Our institutions, lack of social programs, and lack of any care in the…

 @9MJ27LB from Minnesota answered…9hrs9H

They should take what is avaiable nefore going to public property to sleep like they culd see if there is any shelter o…

 @9MHZTNM from Connecticut answered…10hrs10H

If buildings can be developed from other empty or abandoned buildings they should focus on shelters for the homeless, th…

 @9MHZLGK from Florida answered…10hrs10H

It depends on the end result. If it is just to get inexpensive housing for less fortunate people without addressing caus…

 @9MHXPWX from Kansas answered…11hrs11H

No, and increase shelters/housing as most are overcrowded/intense or aggressive toward the homeless.

 @9MHXCL5 from Maine answered…12hrs12H

The government should prevent corporations from buying up single family housing to drive down the price of homes availab…