Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NXW9RJ from Utah answered…41mins41m

Regulation and government control are factors causing rent to be so high. We need to break monopolies over housing and a…

 @9NXW9RJ from Utah answered…41mins41m

It should be a case-by-case basis. We need to do what's in their best interest. Address the homelessness crisis.

 @9NXTZNC from Washington answered…2hrs2H

Yes if people are buying multiple houses for rental properties. large apartment complexes for low income and middle inco…

 @9NXTZNC from Washington answered…2hrs2H

No but develop tiny home camps in a secluded portion of the city and give equal opportunity jobs to the poor to earn min…

 @9NXSY8J from Pennsylvania answered…3hrs3H

Yes, but only during certain periods or for certain reasons.

 @9NXRMT7 from Washington answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but ensure the restrictions are based on resident basis, more merit for this intending to live in the property full…

 @9NXRMT7 from Washington answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but within reason. Allow them space as long as they do not inhibit the use of the space for others, do not litter,…

 @9NXRGFB from Ohio answered…5hrs5H

Yes, and the government should implement more policies which make being a residential landlord undesirable.

 @9NXN4FH from California answered…6hrs6H

No, but the government should not be the reason why the person is facing foreclosure.

 @9NXN4FH from California answered…6hrs6H

No, it is not the government’s responsibility, it is a moral person’s responsibility

 @9NXP8Z9 from Oregon answered…7hrs7H

For 1. If they own the property its none of the government's business and 2. That should only apply to subsidized housin…

 @9NXP8BY from Idaho answered…7hrs7H

No, but they should regulate the amount of realty corporations can own or at least create penalties for properties not p…

 @9NXNN5F from Texas answered…7hrs7H

Subsidies should be provided to those based on net worth. Higher-income or net-worth families shouldn't benefit from the…

 @9NXNN5F from Texas answered…7hrs7H

No. If someone that is homeless refused actively available shelter or housing then they are directly responsible for fin…

 @9NXMNJQ from New York answered…7hrs7H

Predatory mortgages and rent hiking should be monitored and a form of loan forgiveness for unforeseen tragedies should…

 @9NXBZMG from California answered…10hrs10H

It shouldn't be nessairly required however I think if the housing is taking up lots of land it should be added

 @9NXBGB5 from Alabama answered…10hrs10H

With wages having no increase but the economy increasing everyday, rent should be significally lowered than what it is t…

 @9NXBGB5 from Alabama answered…10hrs10H

The person offering them shelter should ask them why they refuce shelter and housing assuming it's free.

 @9NX72S3 from Illinois answered…11hrs11H

This should not be absolute. I believe that it should depend on the location of the developments and the situation that…

 @9NX6774 from Illinois answered…11hrs11H

I think this should based on the financial status of the homeowners

 @9NWT77R from Alabama answered…14hrs14H

The government should handle inflation first. No one would have to increase rent if the government had a handle on infla…

 @9NW3ZYS from Oregon answered…23hrs23H

I think it depends on the situation, like if they were just entirely irresponsible than no but otherwise yes.

 @9NW3ZYS from Oregon answered…23hrs23H

I think this isn't bad and is good but I think it fails to target the key reasons for homelessness, which won't go down…

 @9NW3ZYS from Oregon answered…23hrs23H

Yes but if the government could make housing more affordable in the first place that would be better

 @9NW3ZYS from Oregon answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but being in alignment with inflation and wages, so it's not unaffordable, but also represents the quality of the h…