Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MT2Y5M from Missouri answered…6hrs6H

No, it's a public-private partnership and the private entities who stand to profit should be making the investments, not…

 @9MSY53W from New York answered…8hrs8H

No, Balance the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges with building new infrastructure.

 @Levi-Blevins from Virginia answered…9hrs9H

Not until autonomous vehicles become more widespread

 @9MSWZCG from Michigan answered…9hrs9H

The government shouldn't be involved in regulating vehicles

 @9MSVJJG from Virginia answered…10hrs10H

Cutting other social program and planned parenthood funding would allow both

 @9MSNM83 from Virginia answered…12hrs12H

Yes, as much as they regulate human-driven cars (which is not really all that much)

 @9MSNM83 from Virginia answered…12hrs12H

Yes, but within reason, additional requirements could cause public transportation systems to just not be expanded/ inves…

 @9MSJTF4 from Idaho answered…13hrs13H

The government would be wise to provide Dual Mode Transportation corridors. This is what would save energy and the plan…

 @9CLR7CL from Utah answered…13hrs13H

No, but the government should subsidize electric vehicles and it make it significantly easier for electric vehicles to b…

 @9MSGYVD from Illinois answered…13hrs13H

No, instead we should deregulate the rail industry so that private companies are more likely and able to invest in these…

 @9MSFWP2 from New Hampshire answered…13hrs13H

Yes, but they shouldn’t raise taxes to do so. There’s plenty of money circulating, they just need to rewrite the budget.

 @9MS94TY from Texas answered…14hrs14H

The government should incentivize companies to shift their production toward affordable electric vehicles, but not requi…

 @9MS94TY from Texas answered…14hrs14H

Yes, but only in dense urban areas which are easily navigable on bicycles.

 @9MS89QZ from Washington answered…14hrs14H

some people may be broke and need to get to their job so make it cost-less. America is not that greedy cmon now

 @9MS6H62 from Florida answered…15hrs15H

Yes, if we provide environmentally safe free public transportation the public can get where they need for free, using th…

 @9MS5WLH from Indiana answered…15hrs15H

No, but designed for safety of the driver, pedestrians, and others on the road.

 @9MS5WLH from Indiana answered…15hrs15H

Yes, but also revise the road design when something like this happens.

 @9MS33FJ from Indiana answered…16hrs16H

no, unless the usage of bicycles becomes more prevalent throughout the nation

 @9MS2G3M from Virginia answered…16hrs16H

not, not required, but to make 2 models of each car. One normal then the other having the classic automobile look.

 @9MRXBN2 from Virginia answered…16hrs16H

It should only be required once electric vehicles are guaranteed to work the same as fossil fuel driven vehicles and onc…

 @9MRXBN2 from Virginia answered…16hrs16H

The decision to preserve classic aesthetics should be encouraged, but the choice ultimately should be up to the manufact…

 @9MRVDQD from Pennsylvania answered…17hrs17H

Yes, because it would make the autonomous vehicles a little safer.

 @9MRVDQD from Pennsylvania answered…17hrs17H

Yes, because there should still be a person in the car, making sure it is safe.