Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N7SV2S from Georgia answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but only after thorough research into the long lasting effects on our health, and with frequent and consistent test…

 @9N7PGBC from North Carolina answered…7hrs7H

Government doesn’t need to constantly regulate things BUT this should be a willingness participation type situation and…

 @9N7NRC3 from New York answered…8hrs8H

The government should allow the market to determine this, and not position itself as for our against at any level.

 @9N7CFTX from New York answered…11hrs11H

Leave it at the local government level. I believe the majority of school districts already require it.

 @9N73RR7 from Tennessee answered…13hrs13H

Crispr is an abomination. Humans are not meant to be edited or experiment on in this way, or at all.

 @9N6YGZT from Texas answered…14hrs14H

Yes, with respect to actual vaccines for deadly diseases, but no for therapeutics without any longitudinal studies

 @9N6WNH5 from Maryland answered…15hrs15H

I say no because I feel as if over exploring space will then only cause farther problems to be started just because of t…

 @9N6SZYLfrom Maine  answered…16hrs16H

They shouldn't be required by law; but the market should encourage it if it is economically relevant.

 @9N6SWZ3 from North Carolina answered…16hrs16H

yes and no. because yes it is cleaner and renewable we can have nuclear reactor meltdowns or have something like the vid…

 @9N6K8JM from Louisiana answered…18hrs18H

Yes, but only with those companies wishing to take part being required to collectively fund an independent oversight of…

 @9N694LC from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but I feel like there's a lot of other important things the government should worried about other than sending peop…

 @9N694LC from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

Yeah, but I feel like it shouldn't be a complete replacement if it doesn't end up being all that great.