Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N7TRFX from Missouri answered…2hrs2H

It needs to be addressed as a health and criminal issue. Some people are the victim and need to be helped through a hea…

 @9N7TRFX from Missouri answered…2hrs2H

I think we need to look at individual circumstances. some just can't work. But others could at least volunteer a few h…

 @9N7TRFX from Missouri answered…2hrs2H

eligibility should only be for elderly and disabled, we should go to a value based care and fees for services determined…

 @9N7Q95T from Minnesota answered…5hrs5H

It shouldn't be outright banned but it should be regulated. And the potential health risks should be made clear.

 @9N7PGBC from North Carolina answered…5hrs5H

It should be based off profit margins. If a company is making 3000% (dramatic example) profit off a drug vs manufacturin…

 @9N7PGBC from North Carolina answered…5hrs5H

It should be based off profit margins. If a company is making 3000% profit off a drug vs manufacturing cost then yes. Bu…

 @9MYY7PJ from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

No, as long as individuals have been paying premiums for at least 3 months, unless the pre-existing condition is conside…

 @9MYY7PJ from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

Yes, however healthcare market should be owned by the states, with states taking competitive bids for vouchers to cover…

 @9N7G5X4 from New Jersey answered…8hrs8H

No the government should ban this products but maybe propose a tax on them

 @9N7G5X4 from New Jersey answered…8hrs8H

No the funding shouldn’t be increased but instead switch to a universal healthcare plan but still keep the private optio…

 @9N7FSVJ from Wisconsin answered…9hrs9H

Yes but lower it for the elderly. Should also be more accessible and affordable in low-income and "hood" areas. Polluted…

 @9N74V9Y from Massachusetts answered…11hrs11H

Yes, however medicare-for-all type program would be much better, aligning with much of the rest of the world with simila…

 @9N6XZGY from Georgia answered…13hrs13H

No, but we should penalize drug companies from making prices too high, especially when the margin of net flow is set abo…

 @9N6WNH5 from Maryland answered…13hrs13H

I feel as if should be a requirement but if vaccinations are prohibited due to proven religious reasoning then they shou…

 @9N6WDSC from Washington answered…13hrs13H

I feel like the government should strongly recommend COVID vaccinations, but not require them. Let natural selection tak…

 @9N6VWLF from New Jersey answered…13hrs13H

Yes, for elderly & disabled and would much rather have a single payer option for actual healthcare-not the sick care we…

 @9N6PJL4 from Maryland answered…15hrs15H

Things like vapes etc shouldn't be promoted junk food maybe disclose eating it with moderation etc.

 @9N6K8JM from Louisiana answered…17hrs17H

No. However all insurance should be required to offer insurance to all states if they desire to offer to more than one s…

 @9N6K8JM from Louisiana answered…17hrs17H

Yes. People who are able-bodied should be required to do something for the assistance. If unable to find work, verifiabl…

 @9N6DPHN from Iowa answered…18hrs18H

Obamacare was a giveaway to big insurance companies and did little for everyday people that couldn't have been done with…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…22hrs22H

Universities can set their own policies and students, along with their parents, can decide which universities to attend.

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…22hrs22H

Yes. While their should be options available to those with pre-existing conditions, government should not be involved wi…

 @9J2XFYK from Colorado answered…23hrs23H

No, but disincentivize the purchase of these goods by increasing their sales taxes