Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MN4X2K from California answered…3hrs3H

No, but but fund more public shelters and low income or free housing, such as tiny homes for those who need to get back…

 @9MN37YC from Virginia answered…4hrs4H

I would say yes and no, i believe that there should be grounds for homeless people in parts of not accepting shelter, bu…

 @9MMY8QC from Ohio answered…6hrs6H

Yes, they should be allowed to camp on public property, but only from certain hours and only for so many days. No long t…

 @9MMTXQY from Wisconsin answered…8hrs8H

I believe yes but only in certain areas. For example, they could scare kids if they sleep at a playground.

 @9MMS87Z from Hawaii answered…8hrs8H

There should be alotted places for them to camp and can continue living in which they currently wish (assuming they do n…

 @9MMJGLG from North Carolina answered…18hrs18H

yes but give them specific areas to sleep at bc they cant be at every public area bc some homeless people be doing thing…

 @9MMHXMM from California answered…19hrs19H

No, but I think if we invested more in better temporary housing, food, and better public healthcare - it would really de…

 @9MMHKYX from Washington answered…19hrs19H

No, but provide more free shelters for the homeless and social programs to get people back on their feet.

 @7Y7VN8H from Florida answered…22hrs22H

Yes but, the homeless person should remove themselves from the property when the building opens for business as usual. N…

 @9MMCWY5 from Florida answered…23hrs23H

Yes, as long as they remove themselves when the public building opens for business or regular operations. No loitering o…