Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N72BF9 from Pennsylvania answered…2hrs2H

No, I believe that it is cruel thing to do to the animals, and they should find a better way to do the testing.

 @9N6XNZ8 from Illinois answered…3hrs3H

Yes and no. We’ve tried and failed. There needs to be more focus on research and education on the topic first.

 @9N6WNH5 from Maryland answered…4hrs4H

I say no because I feel like if they chose to buy this type of car knowing the stipulation of it then that is their duty…

 @9N6SBJQ from California answered…5hrs5H

We are building too much and saving too much! Focus on more control burns. Focus on not saving and building too much. Ou…

 @9N6K8JM from Louisiana answered…7hrs7H

Yes, but only in situations where it is financially feasible. When installation will never recover the initial cost, it…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…12hrs12H

The best way for government to combat climate change would be to lower taxes and end artificial barriers to entry that p…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…12hrs12H

The best way for government to combat climate change would be to lower taxes and end artificial barriers to entry that p…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…13hrs13H

The best way to combat climate change is by reducing taxes and artificial barriers to entry so that incentives for innov…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…13hrs13H

The best way to combat climate change is by reducing taxes and artificial barriers to entry so that incentives for innov…

 @9N5XMF7 from Texas answered…14hrs14H

No, carbon capture is too expensive and impractical. The government should tax carbon emissions instead

 @9N5XMF7 from Texas answered…14hrs14H

Yes, carbon emissions should be taxes and there should be incentives for non-carbon emission producing energy production

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…15hrs15H

No, carbon capture is a relatively ineffectual technology. We should support hydroelectric and nuclear energy instead

 @9N5VFFN from Georgia answered…16hrs16H

No. Free markets will allow for technological advancement that improves the environment without sacrificing quality of…

 @9N5VB6Y from Virginia answered…16hrs16H

No, that money should be devoted to making US infrastructure capable of supporting electric vehicles

 @9N5QBQ7 from Oklahoma answered…19hrs19H

No because they're simply doing it wrong. Current carbon regulations hurt more than help since they incentivize manufact…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…21hrs21H

The government pays farmers to not grow crops in areas they deem environmentally sensitive, compensating them for what t…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…21hrs21H

Government should lower taxes and eliminate artificial barriers to entry for all firms large and small, allowing market…