Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NPDV7R from California answered…1hr1H

Firearms manufacturing companies are no more liable for gun violence than car manufacturers are for DUI accidents.

 @9NPCFL3 from North Carolina answered…1hr1H

No, but all representative districts should 1) be drawn along existing County/County-Equivalent borders, 2) be contiguou…

 @9NPDB2H from California answered…2hrs2H

It should only be legal as a last result in extreme distress where life is in danger, but not for freedom of speech

 @9NPBG95 from California answered…4hrs4H

It depends on the teachers mental health state, if it’s good, the teacher should be allowed to carry.

 @9NP93RH from California answered…5hrs5H

I think there should be more checks on who can purchase a gun. People should go though back round checks and should be t…

 @9NP8MJS from Ohio answered…6hrs6H

Yes they can sue if it’s proven that the dealer did not do an extensive back ground check before selling the fire arm.

 @9NNSG36 from Nebraska answered…11hrs11H

I feel like they have helped minorties advance in society but they've also caused resentment in some communities.

 @9NNNY5J from New York answered…13hrs13H

Yes, justices who lie, or are blatantly deceptive, in their confirmation hearing should be removed, and there should be…

 @9NNNY5J from New York answered…13hrs13H

Yes, but only when there is some culpability. (e.g. someone buying 100 automatic weapons for "personal use")

 @9NNJG6K from Minnesota answered…14hrs14H

No, unless the weapon in the violent crime was non-conforming to national regulations at the time of manufacture, or at…

 @9NNGXLB from Connecticut answered…15hrs15H

Yes as it's their right to, but the businesses aren't responsible for the actions of their consumers

 @9NN9QV5 from New Jersey answered…17hrs17H

They should be allowed to sue their state for allowing loose gun laws to the point where they had to become a victim of…

 @9NN3W9Z from New Jersey answered…17hrs17H

No, I think that term limits should be useful, but let the Supreme Court decide on the basis of the issue. Otherwise the…

 @9NN6HG7from Vermont  answered…18hrs18H

The Supreme Court should be reformed. It should be non partisan. There should be term limits. The appointment process sh…

 @9NN3W9Z from New Jersey answered…19hrs19H

Yes, use only to set term limits on judges to prevent corruption, but the Supreme Court should not be politicized.