If the baby is not a human, what is it?

The same is true for a zygote, but at a much more advanced level, in which the zygote isn’t even conscious or developed enough to feel, think, or move the same way as a fully grown human.

Again, as I've pointed out so many times, but you've never fully addressed, by claiming that consciousness, development, feeling, or capacity for rational thought is what gives you the right not be murdered, you are logically necessitating the existence of disastrous moral implications for the deformed, paralysed, insane, mentally incompetent, and people on life support at hospitals. If these are the reasons that the baby should be murdered, than you must, if you are logically consistent, think it is justified to murder all of those fully-grown human beings I have listed above.

This therefore allows the parent far more power kver what they can do to the zygote, which can reach the level of termination to stop the process as the moral value of the zygote is lacking due to a similar lack of any development.

Again, your entire argument is an abomination against both logic and morality, and no matter how many times you recycle and repackage your illogical and irrational justifications for baby murder, they remain illogical and irrational. And to end your incoherent diatribe you finished with a false equivalence fallacy with a chicken and an egg and an unborn human being. It's honestly sad to see how low Pro-Death people can go.