@9KJYKN7 3mos3MO
Oh yes, definitely. Us Americans are already very advantaged, and it would not hurt to use our already strong and unstoppable military to do something as simple to deliver humanitarian aid. Humanity should work together, we should unite, we should help each other. Leaving others in the dust and dark just because "it will bother you" to help them is not right. Stating that it puts the lives of Americans in jeopardy is not right either. Again, we are all human beings, we must work together. What all happened to the "Arsenal of Democracy," and the "World Police." We are the strongest and most privileged country in the world, and it would be right to work only for the greater good of humanity, never for ourselves; to go down in history as something great, and to create a world for all.
@9KG6LFG3mos3MO
Humanitarian intervention can, in fact, take a variety of forms: material assistance (through relief aid), sanctions (coercive, non-military pressure to end abusive practices) and, finally, the dispatch of military forces to remedy a human disaster.
@9KG6LFG3mos3MO
Humanitarian intervention can, in fact, take a variety of forms: material assistance (through relief aid), sanctions (coercive, non-military pressure to end abusive practices) and, finally, the dispatch of military forces to remedy a human disaster.
@9KG3SZ33mos3MO
Puts our Americans in more danger .
@9KFW8W33mos3MO
I believe that we shouldn't leave ourselves on empty with supplies, although I do think help should be given.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
