Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Before you can meaningfully argue liability, you have to reach a place where you can agree that firearms' primary use is to commit crimes. You may be able to establish that so many violent crimes involve a firearm, so many deaths, or suicides, but it doesn't truly support the assumption that the primary use of firearms is illegal activity. Many firearm uses don't lend themselves to measurement by the same metrics as deaths or injuries or other easily quantifiable standards.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.