For instance, his Libertarian stance of minimal government interference in the economy might not be feasible given the complex economic and social issues we face today.
Take, for example, the issue of healthcare. Johnson is a proponent of free-market healthcare, arguing that competition will lower costs. However, many would argue that healthcare is not a typical market. If you're sick or injured, you can't shop around for the best deal as you might for a car or a TV, and this often leads to inflated costs.
I think healthcare ran by the government would be more beneficial than a free-market approach.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.