Try the political quiz

308 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Would you rather live in a world with complete safety but limited freedoms, or one with risks but full personal autonomy?

 @9KZN6QR from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

I would live a life with risk with full personal autonomy

 @9L3YDPPRepublican from Tennessee agreed…2mos2MO

I think having freedoms and potential having to make more risky decisions is better than your life being run by the government in a communist society.

 @9KZPF5R from Tennessee answered…2mos2MO

 @9KZNJ7SWomen’s Equality from Louisiana answered…2mos2MO

WASHINGTON – Today, Alejandro Mayorkas was officially sworn in as the seventh Secretary of Homeland Security. Secretary Mayorkas took the oath this afternoon after the Senate voted to confirm him. As Secretary of Homeland Security, Mayorkas now leads the third largest federal department in the United States, which includes the

 @9KZNHT7answered…2mos2MO

In my opinion limiting freedoms is inherently anti-life. You cannot live a fulfilled life unless you are truly free so I would rather live in a risky world with absolute freedom

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would you ensure the accuracy of information in a system where the media was state-controlled?

 @9KK9TZDIndependent from California answered…2mos2MO

If the government was in a state-controlled system with technology, we must do it in a way that is not too invasive to individuals.

 @9KJ7R8Vanswered…2mos2MO

In a system where the media was state controlled it would depend on the reliability of the state.

 @9KJ2P32 from Virginia answered…2mos2MO

Remove all government control over media and allow us to put out truthful information instead of being censored

 @9KJ2CF3 from Ohio answered…2mos2MO

Well I don't know because the government is corrupt as it is, and having it be the only one in control of news outlets sounds like a disaster.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If the music you love was deemed 'unacceptable,' how would that influence your perception of artistic freedom?

 @9HW45P2 from South Carolina answered…4mos4MO

 @9HW3TF3 from Virginia answered…4mos4MO

It depends on who is deeming it to be so if it is the government they have no say in what I listen to so there for I would not listen to.

 @9HZLSN2 from Minnesota agreed…4mos4MO

If the government was restricting what music people listen to, I would argue it violates the right to privacy.

 @9HW43FC from Wisconsin answered…4mos4MO

The music that I love it what I love.You can't call it unacceptable because it not your choice in what I like. that is not for you to decide so I would be very upset.

 @9HZ9KZ8Republican from Ohio agreed…4mos4MO

Music is a First Amendment freedom of speech and expression. By labeling music you disagree with unacceptable you are saying that an individual does not deserve the same rights you exercise.

 @9HW3Q4V from Tennessee answered…4mos4MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would your social interactions change if public conversations had to avoid a list of state-prohibited topics?

 @9KZNK8Z from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

Our conversations would change because we would no longer have the freedom of speech that every American citizen has the right to.

 @9L36CSV from Indiana agreed…2mos2MO

We all as Americans have the right to free speech but if we ended up with a list of what was okay and not okay to say then it would be annoying and frustrating to communicate.

 @9KZP3KB from Texas answered…2mos2MO

There is a possibility of speech being limited and another possibility of violating peoples rights.

 @9KZNJN8answered…2mos2MO

I would only avoid them when I knew I was being heard by someone who would report me

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

When, if ever, is it justified for the government to silence voices in the interest of national security?

 @9KLC84X from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

I believe that it is vital we maintain the ability to speak and assemble freely. However, I do see how it may be useful in bettering society by eliminating hate speech or neutralizing those who intend to do harm.

 @9KL9S7S  from New York answered…2mos2MO

 @9KL99GS from Ohio answered…2mos2MO

Almost never. Giving away nuclear codes or outing current US troop locations to an enemy force for example that's about it. Certainly not for "hate speech" or supposed incitement.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

As a high school student, how would you react if participation in extracurricular activities depended on your political stance?

 @9JJMQNF from Georgia answered…3mos3MO

It shouldn't matter what your political stance is to join a certain extracurricular activity.

 @9JJFTY9 from Texas answered…3mos3MO

I would react frustrated and confused at first sight, due to the fact that playing sports depended on politics.

 @9JJFR6F from Louisiana answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How much of your personal freedom would you be willing to give up for a guarantee of comprehensive healthcare?

 @9HW4K8JWomen’s Equality from Kansas answered…4mos4MO

I don't think we should have to give up any rights for comprehensive health care. Health care is a human right.

 @9HW5KBZanswered…4mos4MO

 @9HW5YSX from Maryland answered…4mos4MO

Only what is required for effective treatment and contain or eliminate serious infectious disease such as measles, COVID, etc

 @9HW4NR3Socialistanswered…4mos4MO

I woulnd't mind giving up some freedom for free/more affordable health care

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you feel if the government monitored all your online activities to ensure public safety?

 @9HDTZTDanswered…5mos5MO

I would feel this is a violation of my first amendment right.

 @9HCLN9P  from Ohio commented…5mos5MO

texts and other things you may be doing on your phone should not be monitored unless the police or someone of higher authority is suspicious of a crime

 @9HDV8BX from Texas answered…5mos5MO

 @9HDVY73answered…5mos5MO

 @9HDVDVJ from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How might your daily life look different if you needed permission to move to a different city or country?

 @9HW2G64Democrat from South Carolina answered…4mos4MO

It would be more stressful and chaotic. This would also put more on workers plates when they should be focused on other, more important things than being worried as to why I am moving to a different city.

 @9HXHLJMPeace and Freedom from Washington agreed…4mos4MO

We should be free to move where we want to, this freedom of movement will benefit the economy considering that someone might be more productive with work in some places rather than others.

 @9HW2KCVIndependentanswered…4mos4MO

 @9HW2JL3Democrat from Illinois answered…4mos4MO

very much different because if I had to have permission to move then I would get upset because I would have to wait before moving. My life would be different depending on the time.

 @9HW2X6B from North Carolina answered…4mos4MO

If i needed permission to go somewhere I can agree because you never know if someone like a bomber or shooter might pull up

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you found out your conversations were being recorded for your 'safety,' how would you react?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can a society truly be fair if individuals are allowed to do anything they want, regardless of how it affects others?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...