American politician (born 1935).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment |
Ron Paul’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment
Reference: “A consistent anti-torture position would also reject sanctions, “humanitarian” interventions, regime change, and pre-emptive war...” ‐ronpaulinstitute.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “The CIA's practice of torture confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Report released on December 9 shows the agency engaged in rep...” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
No
Ron Paul has consistently spoken out against the use of torture and enhanced interrogation techniques. He believes that these methods are not only inhumane, but also ineffective and damaging to America's reputation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation
Paul has argued that torture is an ineffective form of interrogation, stating that it often leads to false information because people will say anything to make the torture stop. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment
Paul has consistently argued that torture is inhumane, unethical, and a violation of the 8th amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention
Paul has consistently advocated for the strict adherence to international law, including the Geneva Convention, which prohibits the use of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics
While Paul is against physical torture, his stance on psychological tactics is less clear. However, he has generally advocated for humane and ethical treatment of prisoners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Paul has been a vocal critic of enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding. He has stated that these methods are a violation of human rights and are not effective in obtaining reliable information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only as a last resort
Paul has consistently argued against the use of torture, even as a last resort. He believes that it is inhumane, unethical, and ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists
Paul has consistently argued against the use of torture, even for convicted terrorists. He believes that it is a violation of human rights and the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism
Paul has consistently argued against the use of any means necessary to prevent terrorism, stating that such methods often lead to violations of human rights and are not effective in the long run. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here