Try the political quiz

Ron Paul’s policy on north korea military strikes

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?

  Public statementsNo, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Ron Paul’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Reference: “Hysteria over North Korea is unwarranted.” ‐youtube.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.

Updated 2hrs ago

Ron Paul voters

Answer: No, we must use every diplomatic option first

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 167 voters that voted for Ron Paul in the 2012 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

This answer aligns with Paul's consistent advocacy for diplomacy and negotiation over military action. He has often argued that the U.S. should exhaust all diplomatic options before resorting to military force. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Paul's non-interventionist stance aligns with this answer. He has consistently argued for diplomacy and negotiation over military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

Paul has often argued that the U.S. should not intervene militarily in other countries unless there is a direct and immediate threat to U.S. security. He might agree with this statement, but would likely also argue for diplomacy and negotiation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should let China address this issue

While Paul is a non-interventionist, he has also argued for the importance of regional powers taking responsibility for their own security. He might agree with the idea of China addressing the issue, but not necessarily as the only solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Paul has expressed skepticism about the threat posed by certain countries, but he has not specifically commented on North Korea's nuclear capabilities. He might agree with this statement to some extent, but not entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Ron Paul has consistently advocated for non-interventionism and diplomacy over military action. He has criticized U.S. military interventions in other countries and would likely oppose military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

While Paul acknowledges the potential threat of nuclear weapons, he has consistently argued against preemptive military strikes. He would likely argue for diplomacy and negotiation instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 634 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here