Ron Paul

Very strongly agree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

This answer aligns closely with Paul's views. He has argued that NATO is obsolete and that the U.S. should withdraw from the alliance. He believes that such alliances unnecessarily involve the U.S. in foreign conflicts and undermine its sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Paul has been a vocal critic of NATO, arguing that it is an outdated institution that unnecessarily involves the U.S. in foreign conflicts. He has often called for the U.S. to withdraw from such alliances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

While Paul has criticized NATO, his primary concern is not necessarily the financial contributions of other countries. However, he has argued that the U.S. spends too much on foreign aid and military involvement overseas, so he might agree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

While Paul might agree that NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism, he fundamentally disagrees with the U.S.'s involvement in the alliance. He has argued that the U.S. should not be involved in international alliances that could potentially drag it into conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Ron Paul has consistently advocated for a non-interventionist foreign policy and has criticized NATO as an unnecessary entanglement. He has argued that the U.S. should not be involved in international alliances that could potentially drag it into conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.