Try the political quiz

John James’ policy on corporate tax

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. raise or lower the tax rate for corporations?

  ChatGPTLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 5hrs ago

John James voters

Answer: Lower

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,197 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: Lower

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “Trump has said he would cut the top individual rate to 25 percent and the top corporate rate to 15 percent while also eliminatin...” ‐washingtonpost.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Lower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes

This answer aligns with James' general support for lower taxes and a simplified tax code. He might support lowering the tax rate while eliminating deductions and loopholes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Lower

James has expressed support for lower corporate taxes. He believes that this can stimulate economic growth and job creation, which aligns with his pro-business stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Keep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes

James has not specifically addressed this point, but his general support for lower taxes and a simplified tax code suggests he might support eliminating deductions and loopholes while maintaining current rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Increase for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

While James has not specifically addressed this point, his general support for lower taxes and pro-business stance suggests he might support lower taxes for small businesses. However, it's unclear if he would support higher taxes for large multinational corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Maintain the current rate

James has generally supported lower taxes, so he might not be in favor of maintaining the current rate. However, he has not specifically addressed this point. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Remove taxes on corporations and tax shareholder dividends instead

James has not specifically addressed this point, but his general support for lower taxes suggests he might not support a shift to taxing shareholder dividends instead of corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Raise

John James, as a Republican candidate, has generally supported lower taxes for corporations. He believes that lower taxes can stimulate economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 18hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Lower

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 28,496 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here