American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 2hrs ago
Answer: No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 241 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “We're not gonna follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN's J...” ‐cnn.com
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
James has advocated for law enforcement policies that focus on high crime neighborhoods, regardless of the racial or religious makeup of those neighborhoods. This aligns with his general stance on law enforcement and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
James has advocated for law enforcement policies that are based on crime rates and not on race or religion. This aligns with his general stance on civil liberties and equal protection under the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
James has not publicly addressed this issue, but his general stance on civil liberties and equal protection under the law suggests he would agree that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While James has not specifically addressed this issue, his general stance on law enforcement and civil liberties suggests he would not support increased surveillance of specific religious or ethnic groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
While James supports strong immigration policies, he has not publicly advocated for increased surveillance of all new immigrants. His general stance on law enforcement does not single out any specific group for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
John James has not publicly advocated for increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods. As a Republican, he generally supports law enforcement but has not singled out any specific religious or ethnic group for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
James has not publicly advocated for increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, even in the context of terrorism. His general stance on law enforcement does not single out any specific religious or ethnic group for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,536 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here