More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($75K-$100K) voters
Last answered 3 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($75K-$100K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
- South Carolina
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
3 years ago by washingtonexaminer.com
3 years ago by nationalreview.com
3 years ago by redstate.com
3 years ago by alternet.org
4 years ago by westernjournalism.com
4 years ago by dailycaller.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Immigration Healthcare
Illegal immigrants, as well as legal immigrants in the country less than five years, are not eligible for free healthcare through Medicaid. A 2007 study estimated that less than 1 percent of Medicaid spending went to healthcare for illegal immigrants. Proponents of subsidized healthcare for immigrants argue that increased access to basic preventive care will lower the demand for costly emergency care. Opponents argue that immigrants in the healthcare system run the risk of becoming "permanent patients," because they have no relatives, insurance or an established address where they can go once released. See recent immigration healthcare news
More stances on this issue
This is a public health issue. If people are sick, if it turns out they have a communicable disease, they can't be afraid to or not have access to health care. If we don't want illegal's in the country enforce the boarders and... 3 years ago from a Green in Sterling, VA
The government should subsidize a fund for emergency healthcare but only in true emergencies and any services provided should be paid back by persons who used these emergency facilities--if they are minors the parents should be held accountable.... 3 years ago from a Republican in Austin, TX
Only for life threatening emergencies, pregnancies, or they pay taxes. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Clementon, NJ
No, but their children should have access and both, parents and children, should be given access for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Lancaster, PA
No, but children should have access and they should be able to purchase private healthcare. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Framingham, MA
No, but their children should have acces if and only if they were born in
the US. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Douglassville, PA
Yes, because it will end up costing US citizens more money if they go bankrupt. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Chestnut Hill, MA
No, but there should be efforts to naturalize them so taxes can be paid. 3 years ago from a Green in Cincinnati, OH
No, but their children should have access, and only if they were born in the country. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Storrs Mansfield, CT