Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NYYCX5from Maine  answered…2hrs2H

It really depends on where they are. Like if it doesn't cause harm to the individual or anyone around them, then it shou…

 @9NYWH5T from Illinois answered…3hrs3H

There should be public space more dedicated to that purpose to protect function of currently occupied public spaces

 @9NYVNVQ from Utah answered…3hrs3H

Yes, but programs should emphasize occupational and educational opportunities, societal rehabilitation, and community pa…

 @9NYVNB8 from Illinois answered…3hrs3H

To a degree. They need to ensure that the renter not only gets their money back but ensure that they also pocket money f…

 @9NYVMPQ from Vermont answered…3hrs3H

No, low income housing should reflect a profit motive and the government should have a permanent cap on real estate taxe…

 @9NYNK7F from Missouri answered…5hrs5H

No. Homeowners get themselves into their own troubles, they should get out of it themselves too without the citizens of…

 @9NYLLPV from South Carolina answered…6hrs6H

No, but they should institute policies to discourage landlords from hoarding properties to increase competition between…

 @9NYLD7Q from Indiana answered…6hrs6H

No because they refused care, but they should make some public property’s illegal and some that are less important or do…

 @9NYKLM4 from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

Depends on what type of development it is. If it is a development for older residents then there would be no need for a…

 @9NXW9RJ from Utah answered…15hrs15H

Regulation and government control are factors causing rent to be so high. We need to break monopolies over housing and a…

 @9NXW9RJ from Utah answered…15hrs15H

It should be a case-by-case basis. We need to do what's in their best interest. Address the homelessness crisis.

 @9NXTZNC from Washington answered…17hrs17H

Yes if people are buying multiple houses for rental properties. large apartment complexes for low income and middle inco…

 @9NXTZNC from Washington answered…17hrs17H

No but develop tiny home camps in a secluded portion of the city and give equal opportunity jobs to the poor to earn min…

 @9NXSY8J from Pennsylvania answered…18hrs18H

Yes, but only during certain periods or for certain reasons.

 @9NXRMT7 from Washington answered…20hrs20H

Yes, but ensure the restrictions are based on resident basis, more merit for this intending to live in the property full…

 @9NXRMT7 from Washington answered…20hrs20H

Yes, but within reason. Allow them space as long as they do not inhibit the use of the space for others, do not litter,…

 @9NXRGFB from Ohio answered…20hrs20H

Yes, and the government should implement more policies which make being a residential landlord undesirable.

 @9NXN4FH from California answered…21hrs21H

No, but the government should not be the reason why the person is facing foreclosure.

 @9NXN4FH from California answered…21hrs21H

No, it is not the government’s responsibility, it is a moral person’s responsibility

 @9NXP8Z9 from Oregon answered…21hrs21H

For 1. If they own the property its none of the government's business and 2. That should only apply to subsidized housin…

 @9NXP8BY from Idaho answered…22hrs22H

No, but they should regulate the amount of realty corporations can own or at least create penalties for properties not p…

 @9NXNN5F from Texas answered…22hrs22H

Subsidies should be provided to those based on net worth. Higher-income or net-worth families shouldn't benefit from the…

 @9NXNN5F from Texas answered…22hrs22H

No. If someone that is homeless refused actively available shelter or housing then they are directly responsible for fin…

 @9NXMNJQ from New York answered…22hrs22H

Predatory mortgages and rent hiking should be monitored and a form of loan forgiveness for unforeseen tragedies should…