Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…23hrs23H

White House Says "No Genocide" Happening In Gaza

  27replies

 @9MHGD29 from Wisconsin answered…23mins23m

they should be punished but nothing like death or stuff depending on what they did there punishment would be harsher

 @9MHFS86 from Tennessee answered…44mins44m

Getting the US military involved with Mexican drug cartels is basically like throwing gasoline on an already out of cont…

 @9MHDH7Q answered…1hr1H

I think that it's really situational, like force might be needed but congress should at the very least be AWARE.

 @9MHD9NX from Arkansas answered…1hr1H

Yes, but only if the is substantial evidence against them or if they are in the act of attacking our country.

 @9MHC7NY from Texas answered…2hrs2H

Depends on what the circumstances, if they attack US troops or any other allies and or their troops no, otherwise yes

 @9MH9Q8Q from New Jersey answered…3hrs3H

depends on which drugs. they should push to eliminate all hard substances but keep the medicinal/lighter drugs

 @9MH9HFM from Iowa answered…3hrs3H

in some cases this would be useful, but having this much power can lead to the abuse of it and unnecessary

 @9MH983M from Nevada answered…3hrs3H

the only instance where the president can use military force against Al-Qaeda is when a direct attack happens.

 @9MH8LBC from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

the government gets a lot of the cartel's profits which means in some way the government is letting these cartel's get a…

 @9MH83WT from Pennsylvania answered…4hrs4H

If absolutely needed then yes but there are more terrorist groups out there other than Al-Qaeda so focus on them too

 @9MH73HQ from Virginia answered…5hrs5H

Yes, and South American, European, African, and Asian cartels as well because they are incorporating and working togethe…

 @9MH5JNW from North Dakota answered…6hrs6H

I think the president should be able to authorize attacks but must consult with congress before any action is taken.

 @9MH55ZR from Illinois answered…6hrs6H

yes they should unless in case of emergency such as severe threat to the nation then no they shouldnt

 @9MGY83T from New Jersey answered…13hrs13H

If we were attacked yes. If a conflict is erupting or on going and we are backing up our allys yes we should have congre…

 @9MGW62T from Florida answered…16hrs16H

Estados Unidos son los que controlan los carteles mexicanos que quieren que se acabe su venta de dinero negro o prefiere…

 @9MGV2XM from Massachusetts answered…18hrs18H

if you were to assume someone's a terrorist it doesn't change the fact they could possibly chance they aren't a terroris…

 @9MGTPL7 from California answered…18hrs18H

No, it’s a waste of money. Focus on keeping cartels out of the country and legalize drugs like weed.

 @9MGSRDY from North Carolina answered…20hrs20H

The gov. should go after Mexican drug cartels if they're operating within our borders, done by the Fed. Gov.. But we sh…

 @9MGSRDY from North Carolina answered…20hrs20H

This depends if Al-Qaeda or other terrorist organizations are exasperated of planning a attack on the US gov or The Peop…

 @9MGRCK5 from California answered…21hrs21H

It would be optimal to discover their intentions before coming to a consensus for punishments, if any.

 @9MGR35K from Minnesota answered…21hrs21H

I'm conflicted, as on one hand, we should be quick to respond to major threats, but it's also hard to give one man all t…

 @9MGNTM3 from Montana answered…23hrs23H

while stopping terrorism is a good thing, in the resulting conflicts we murdered countless innocent civilians