This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
@9L4Z23BIndependent 1wk1W
No, not yet. More studies need to be conducted first
@9MKD8QM2wks2W
ASBOLUTELY NOT, and AI is not a person NOR a PEER which would be making a mockery of our legal system which is already plagued by several other issues.
@9N92GYS2 days2D
Perhaps eventually, but not until AI is far better researched and regulated to ensure that its decisions don’t reflect preexisting human biases and can be held accountable for mistakes
@9N8LTDS2 days2D
No, this sounds like a slippery slope of taking out compassion, empathy and sympathy-to take out the humanity in the judicial system.
@9K99V29 4 days4D
No, but the applications of artificial intelligence in such systems should be looked & invested into
@9N33S8DIndependent5 days5D
No, AI should not be used to make decisions in criminal justice systems, but may be used to better facilitate research around the details of the trial by providing quicker turnaround of evidence and precedent for the judge and jury to be able to use to make a decision and appropriate sentencing.
@rosetintedarcher 1wk1W
Yes, as long as it is trained and tested using a politically, ethnically and identifiable diverse range of human testers and trainers.
@9MRL3HG1wk1W
No, artificial intelligence should never be something for people to rely on, it should simply be used as a tool.
@9MPNYMJ1wk1W
No, not unless the AI model being used by the government is carefully vetted for bias and the company or organization producing it is thoroughly scrutinized.
Most the times humans get taken by emotions and make wrong decisions in court and other times, AI would help not be unfair just because of sympathy.
@9MNY3TS1wk1W
Yes, but only for supplemental research and aiding in decision making. It should not be the final answer
@9KWXHJM 2wks2W
No, and impose strict regulations on the use of AI in all law systems
@9MN89262wks2W
Yes, but not to issue rulings and sentences, only to collect all potentially relevant case files and precedents so every defendant has a more fair trial overall.
@9MN5L4RWomen’s Equality2wks2W
No, because it is unethical and violated amendment rights
@9MN4PGY2wks2W
yes, how ever Ai needs to be inspected and absolutely proven. All juros needs to be educated about AI because it is very trippy
@9MLXQTT 2wks2W
I think it depends, AI gets there "minds" from whoever programs and creates it so how would the system know if the AI is biased of not.
@9K99V29 2wks2W
No, but the applications of artificial intelligence in criminal justice systems should be looked into
@SenBR2003 2wks2W
Begin with implementing AI in specialized mock criminal trials to study their effectiveness, then adjust AI programs accordingly before gradually including them in criminal trials.
@9MMB43J2wks2W
Yes, but enable human say to have a stronger weigh on the outcome.
@9MM92DH2wks2W
I think yes, and it should be looked over by people.
@9MM844W2wks2W
no because Ai will choose purely what is legal and illegal, they lack human emotions and the understanding in situations where someone either deserves justice from being raped or a family member killed or situations where it was in self defense.
@9MM7NMZ2wks2W
Sure but with many limitations and no over reliance.
@9MM5PH42wks2W
No, Ai can mistakenly be misused and can be manipulated by criminals.
@9MM5C622wks2W
Yes but the judge should declare the final verdict.
@bahzilfr2wks2W
As of right now, no. As they improve, it may be able to be used but it would need massive checks for biases first.
@9MM4NFT2wks2W
I think it can help give objective thought processes, but I do not think it should be the end all be all.
@9MM2ZQVIndependent2wks2W
It could be usful, but it could just as well be hacked and wrongfully free a bunch of criminals
@9MM288V2wks2W
Somewhat, I think they can help go deeper into a case but shouldn't be used to make a full decision.
@9MM232Q2wks2W
yes and no I think that it wouldn't make best depositions but I don't thank that the laws not always right and in some cases it should be up to how moral the decision is
@Dry550Independent 2wks2W
Yes, a machine has no moral say on matters, it can execute a sentence or assist in law enforcement without second guessing itself
No, they lack the judgement that we humans possess.
To some extent, yes, however human intervention is imperative.
No, but it should be used to assist in analyzing the facts of a case
@9MLMS5Y2wks2W
An AI model could be implemented to compare and contrast court findings and rulings and eliminate bias.
@9MLKF77Independent2wks2W
No - the technology is not ready for something like this. However, I'll re-evaluated this for 2028.
@9MLGS342wks2W
There’s some instances where AI is helpful, and others where AI won’t be helpful
@9MLF9S82wks2W
No, but it is instead used to sum up the information in a case to provide a clearer picture of all evidence provided, not to make decisions.
@9MLF5VJ2wks2W
No, AI should not people do things because of emotions and other people can feel emotions but robots can't.
@3JZDMSDIndependent 2wks2W
Yes, as long as there is a governance committee driving the personas, parameters and workflows in use, and 4 sigma plus quality evaluations.
@Spartan05362wks2W
ABSOLUTELY NOT! This is a gross perversion of our legal system as an AI is not a "peer".
@9ML5WGR2wks2W
Yes, as long as we can be sure it’s programmed to eliminate bias AND is used as a tool for people to make decisions and it isn’t making the decision itself.
@9MKXTDH2wks2W
I have never given this any thought before… I can see both sides of the issue, tbh.
@9MKVB242wks2W
We should let AI be a juror but also let humans decide
@9MK7TRBRepublican2wks2W
Maybe once we can prove it’s ready. It would be better than humans. Humans are faulty and make mistakes
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
