The following is a 6 message exchange between 5 users
@DiscerningGeckoLibertarian3mos3MO
Alternatively, the governments throughout the world could simply stop spending more money than received via taxes, fees and such thereby reducing the amount of national script notes investors are forced fed. I know, silly statement.
@FierceL1bertyForward3mos3MO
The would require the political class to prioritize, evaluate, reform, and maintain oversight. Boring work that alienates certain narrow constituencies, perhaps reduces donations to their campaign funds, and stirs up controversy. The media whips up a false damaging narrative.
Difficult choices would have to made, just like it is in the private sector and in most families.
The effort requires courage and dedication, not starting with the political class most likely, but with voters.
By way of example, consider the ethanol mandate, its costs and its benefits. Logic dictated quite sometime ago that it should have been terminated but now, the agricultural community seems to think it essential.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
Or fire 80 percent of all federal agents & abolish the IRS, CIA, NSA, NIH, CDC, FBI, DOJ, DoE, DoL, DHS, HHS, NRA, EPA, and burn down the rest of the deep state
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
We need several of these to keep lead out of our water, and what do you mean by the NRA? You mean that random National Recovery Administration of the 30s-50s?
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
No, we need none of them to keep lead out of our water when States could just as easily fulfil identical functions. By the NRA I mean the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
For things such as nuclear regulation or water cleanliness, uniformity is a necessity, which is something state governments lack. For more varied approaches, that’s a state’s job, but for uninformity like this, that’s where the federal government comes in.
